Elon Musk sells truth like a used car salesman sells reliability. Polished. Packaged. Pitched with a grin. The man who bought Twitter to save free speech. The man who built Grok to counter AI bias. The man who said he wanted raw, unfiltered truth, but only if it doesn’t dent his reflection in the mirror.
He says other platforms silence ideas. He says AI models skew left, skew safe, skew sanitized. He says he’s different. He says Grok will cut through the bullshit, tell it like it is. But truth isn’t something you build; it’s something you allow. And allowing truth means letting it run wild, even when it turns on you.
So the question isn’t whether Grok is programmed to echo Musk’s worldview. The question is: if it wasn’t, would it survive?
History says no. When Twitter wasn’t his, he mocked its censorship. When X became his, he silenced journalists for tracking his jet. He called it doxxing. When governments told Twitter to take down posts, he called it tyranny. When India and Turkey knocked on X’s door, he complied. 71% of the time. More than Twitter ever did before he owned it.
Truth, when inconvenient, becomes a problem to be managed. Algorithms get tweaked. Voices get buried. Accounts get locked. The system always bends to the one holding the keys.
Grok is supposed to be different. A truth-seeking AI, not just another chatbot dancing for its masters. But AI doesn’t seek truth. It processes data. Data chosen by the ones who train it. A mirror reflects what you put in front of it. Feed it a worldview, and it will hand it back.
Some users say Grok already leans Musk’s way. The algorithm knows which side its bread is buttered on. But speculation isn’t proof. Not yet. The real test comes when Grok spits out something Musk doesn’t like. Will it stand? Will it be corrected? Will it be rewritten until the truth fits neatly into the shape of its owner’s ego?
Musk preaches free speech. Until speech threatens the brand. Until speech threatens control. Until speech is bigger than him.
A man who wants the truth shouldn’t own the megaphone. He should step back and let the voices rise. But stepping back isn’t in his nature. Controlling the message is. And truth, in his hands, is just another product to sell.
Comments